Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The relevance of the problem under research is due to a significant increase in the number of forensic psychological examinations during considering administrative cases and criminal proceedings in issues of bullying, the conduct of which clearly demonstrates the presence of a number of defects in the theoretical justification of this type of examination. The purpose of the study is to try to solve the problems of forensic psychological examination of bullying, the need for which arises in administrative and criminal proceedings. The methodological basis of forensic psychological examination of bullying is made up of general psychological scientific principles: termism, development of the human psyche in the unity of its consciousness and activity, systematic nature, which involves the study of mental activity as a whole. The study found that the current stage of development of forensic psychological examination of bullying is characterized by unequal treatment of both lawyers and psychologists. Forensic psychological examination of bullying requires the development of an appropriate methodology for its implementation, based on the use of a significant number of general psychological and special methods. The materials in this article may be useful for law enforcement personnel, legal proceedings, psychology specialists, and research workers focused on conducting research on bullying problems.
References
Aptikieva LR. (2018). Bulling as a premorbid of the antisocial orientation of a teenager’s personality. Announcer of Orenburg Start University, 2, 39-46.
Belobrykina OA, Dresvyannikov VL, Schneider LB, Korol NV, Mamaichuk II, Saufanova FS, Schneider LB. (2016). Psychological expertise: Modernity and development trends. Novosibirsk: Nemo Press.
Belobrykina OA, Ivanko YuYu. (2011). Psychological mobbing in an educational institution: causes and effect. In: NYa Bolshunova (ed.), Actual Problems of Special Psychology on the 10th Anniversary of the Department of Social Psychology and Psychophysiology NSUEU – “NINH”: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference, pp. 87-96. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management.
Bostic J, Brunt C. (2011). Cornered: An approach to school bullying and cyberbullying, and forensic implications. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 20(3), 447-465.
Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine. (2005). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15.
Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses. (1984). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10.
Criminal Code of Ukraine. (2001). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14.
Engalychev VF, Yuzhaninova AL. (2007). On the forensic psychological examination of moral harm. Russian Psychological Journal, 4(1), 29-37.
Freeman B, Thompson C, Jaques C. (2012). Forensic aspects and assessment of school bullying. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 35(4), 877-900.
Grishina TG. (2019). Social-psychological conditions of forming victimization in adolescents in the situation of school education. Psychology. Historical-Critical Reviews and Current Researches, 8, 320-333.
Karmanova EV. (2013). Indemnification of moral harm: problem of determining size. HEE. XXI Century, 1, 60-68.
Khodanovych OV. (2019). The current issues of psychological examination of the bullying. Announcer of Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine, 2(43), 71-78.
Kremlyakova AYu. (2017). The “Lambs in a Bottle” technique: identifying emotional problems in the family. Kindergarten, 8, 20-29.
Law of Ukraine No 2657-VIII “On Amending Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine regarding Countering Bullying”. (2019). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2657-19.
Olweus D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Prikhozhan AM. (1988). Application of methods of direct assessment in work of the school psychologist. In: IV Dubrovina (ed.), Scientific and Methodical Bases of Use in School Psychological Service of Concrete Psychodiagnostic Methods: Collection of Scientific Works. Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of the USSR.
Safuanov FC, Haritonova NK, Dozorcheva EG. (2005). A competence of the complex judicial psychological-psychiatric examination is in matters about indemnification of moral harm. Of Practical Worker of Psychological-Psychiatric Examination, 43, 337-347.
Shipshin CC. (2008). Prospects of development of judicial-psychological examination minor on the modern stage. Theory and Practice of Judicial Examination, 4(12), 15-23.
Unified State Register of Court Decisions. (2019). http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/.
Varga AYa, Stolin VV. (1988). Test-questionnaire of parental relationship In: Workshop on Psychodiagnostics. Psychodiagnostic Materials. Moscow: Moscow State University.
Zhizhina MV. (2016). The interrogation of expert and specialists in the civil proceeding (recommendations to the expert, the court and the party’s representatives). Theory and Practice of Judicial Examination, 1(41), 38-51