HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE FOURTH GENERATION IN A SINGLE EDUCATIONAL AREA
HUMAN RIGHTS (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

digital rights, somatic (biological) rights, European Court of Human Rights

How to Cite

L. Kokhan, H., I. Leonenko, M. ., M. Perepolkin, S. ., L. Syroid, T. ., & V. Stryzhak, I. . (2020). HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE FOURTH GENERATION IN A SINGLE EDUCATIONAL AREA. Revista Gênero E Interdisciplinaridade, 1(01). https://doi.org/10.51249/gei.v1i01.24

Abstract

The relevance of the issue under study is determined by human rights appearance at the end of the XX the beginning of the XXI centuries that cannot be attributed to any of the three generations of human rights known to scholars; the doctrinal grounds of the necessity to unite them within the fourth generation of human rights; the lack of a universally recognized understanding of human rights of the fourth generation, and the ambiguous practice of their recognition and implementation on both the domestic and international levels.

The purpose of the article is to develop the authors’ model of understanding the concept and classification of human rights of the fourth generation and to make suggestions aimed at getting more acquainted with them representatives of different peoples, to recognize them as quickly as possible and to ensure the most effective application in real life. The key method applied in the fourth generation of human rights research is generalization of the existing concepts of their interpretation within national law of different states, within international law, in the European Court of Human Rights practice, and in the doctrinal views of scientists. This title can be extended to rights not belonging to the first, the second and the third generations of human rights that have arisen at the end of the XX the beginning of the XXI centuries, as well as to human rights that will be revealed and interpreted in the future. As the fourth generation of human rights is in the process of its settling, the approaches to the classification of human rights based on exhaustive lists cannot fully reflect its real state. The content of this article may be of use to scholars studying human rights of the fourth generation, to lecturers teaching subjects dedicated to human rights, to students studying human rights, and to representatives of states and international organizations. involved in the development, recognition and practical implementation of human rights issues.

https://doi.org/10.51249/gei.v1i01.24
HUMAN RIGHTS (Português (Brasil))

References

Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine, on the Prohibition of Cloning Human Beings. (1998). https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168007f2ca

Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Transplantation of Organs and Tissues of Human Origin, (2002). https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680081562

Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning Biomedical Research. (2005). https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168008371a

Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning Genetic Testing for Health Purposes. (2008). https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680084824

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions “Strengthening European Identity through Education and Culture”. (2017). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/communication-strengthening-european-identity-education-culture_en.pdf.

Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union – Protocols – Declarations annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 – Tables of equivalences. (2012). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012M%2FTXT.

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine. (1997). https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98

Cornescu AV. (2009). The Generations of Human’s Rights. Days of Law: the Conference Proceedings. Brno: Masaryk University.

De Frouville O. (2005). Article 1 Paragraphe 3’. In J-P Cot, A Pellet, M Forteau (Eds.), La Charte des Nations Unies: Commentaire Article par Article (pp. 357-378). Paris: Economica.

De Frouville O, Tavernier J (Eds.). (2009). La Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme, 70 ans après: les fondements des drotis de l’homme au défi des nouvelles technologies. Paris: Publications du C.R.D.H.

De Frouville О. (2018). Le système de protection des droits de l’homme des Nations Unies. Présent et avenir. Paris: Publications du C.R.D.H.

Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm Declaration). (1972). https://mwvlw.rlp.de/fileadmin/mwkel/Abteilung_2/8206/06_Nachhaltigkeit_global/1972_Stockholm_Erklaerung_en.pdf

Declaration on the Right to Development. (1986). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/41/128

Dobroboh L, Zavhorodnii V, Orlova O. (2019). Legal education in Ukraine in the context of integration to the European educational space. The Asian International Journal of Life Sciences, 21(2), 421-432.

European Convention on Human Rights. (1950). https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf.

European Court of Human Rights Application No. 13343/87 “Case of B. v. France”. (1992). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-57770.

European Court of Human Rights Application No. 21627/93; 21628/93; 21974/93 “Case of Laskey, Jaggard and Brown v. the United Kingdom”. (1997). http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/laskey1997/.

European Court of Human Rights Application No. 2346/02 “Case of Diane Pretty v. the United Kingdom”. (2002). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-60448%22]}.

European Court of Human Rights Application No. 29381/09 and No. 32684/09 “Case of Vallianatos and Others v. Greece”. (2013). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-57770.

European Court of Human Rights Application No. 6339/05 “Case of Evans v. the United Kingdom”. (2006). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#%7B%22itemid%22:%5B%22001-72684.%22%5D%7D.

General Assembly Resolution 2450 (XXIII), Human Rights and Scientific and Technological Developments. (1986). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/2450(XXIII)

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. (1966a). https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (1966b). https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx

International Declaration on Human Genetic. (2003). http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=17720&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

Karahioz RS, Lehka O.V, Minchenko SI. (2019). Public administration of legal education in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The Asian International Journal of Life Sciences, 21(2), 493-504.

Kuchuk AM, Serdiuk LM, Zavhorodnia Y.S. (2019). Modern law education in the context of natural understanding of law. The Asian International Journal of Life Sciences, 21(2), 359-370.

Lavrick MA. (2005). On the Theory of Somatic Human Rights. Siberian Law Gazette, 3, 16-26.

Pocar F. (2015). Some Thoughts on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the “Generations” of Human Rights. International Human Rights Review, 10, 43-53.

Proclamation of Teheran, Final Act of the International Conference on Human Rights. (1968). http://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/fatchr/Final_Act_of_TehranConf.pdf

Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. (1992). https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf

Rudinsky FM. (2000. Civil Human Rights: General and Theoretical Issues. Law and Life, 31, 15-18.

Sukhorolsky PM. (2013). Problems of Ensuring and Development of Human Rights in Conditions of Information Society. Ukrainian Journal of International Law, 1, 18-23.

Texts of the Council of Europe on bioethical matters. (2014). https://www.coe.int/t/dg3/healthbioethic/Texts_and_documents/INF_2014_5_vol_II_textes_%20CoE_%20bio%C3%A9thique_E%20(2).pdf.

Tirina MP. (2011). Human Rights Generations: Problems of Modern Classification. State and Law, 52, 728-732.

United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning. (2005). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/59/280

Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. (2005). http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights. (1997). http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13177&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

Vašák K. (1977). Human Rights: A Thirty-Year Struggle: the Sustained Efforts to give Force of law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. UNESCO Courier, 11, 29–32.

Vitiv V. (2016). Information Rights as a Component of Fourth Generation of Human Rights. Scientific Notes of Institute of Legislation of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law: Constitutional and Municipal Law, 6, 22-26

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...