Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Dryland territories have increasingly become central to global debates on climate adaptation and sustainability. In the Brazilian Semi-Arid region, particularly within the Caatinga biome, socioecological resilience emerges from the interaction between environmental constraints, local knowledge systems, and community-based resource management. However, the role of women in sustaining these adaptive processes often remains underestimated or analytically fragmented in the literature. This study aims to analyze how women’s protagonism contributes to the construction of biocultural resilience in the Caatinga through the adoption and management of social technologies. Methodologically, the research adopts an integrative literature review conducted between October 2025 and February 2026 in the databases Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, and DOAJ. An initial set of 279 records was identified, from which a final corpus of 25 studies was selected through systematic screening procedures. The results indicate that women play a strategic role in the governance of water resources, agroecological food production, seed conservation, and community organization, forming a network of practices that sustain local socioecological systems. Social technologies such as rainwater harvesting cisterns, agroecological home gardens, and community seed banks strengthen territorial resilience while simultaneously revealing tensions between empowerment and the persistence of gendered labor burdens. The study proposes the concept of female socioecological infrastructure to describe the network of practices, knowledge systems, and social relations through which women sustain ecological and social reproduction in dryland territories. Recognizing these dynamics is essential for developing climate adaptation strategies that integrate gender justice, territorial governance, and socioecological sustainability in the Brazilian Semi-Arid.
References
ABRAMOVAY, Ricardo. Paradigmas do capitalismo agrário em questão. 3. ed. São Paulo: Edusp, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.edusp.com.br/livros/paradigmas-do-capitalismo-agrario-em-questao/
AGRAWAL, Arun. Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. American Anthropologist, v. 107, n. 2, p. 161–172, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2005.107.2.161
ALTIERI, Miguel A.; NICHOLLS, Clara I. Agroecology: A brief account of its origins and currents of thought in Latin America. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, v. 41, n. 3–4, p. 231–237, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1287147
BRANDÃO, Thales Ferreira B.; et al. Organização social e gestão associativa rural entre agricultores familiares do semiárido brasileiro. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, v. 60, n. 2, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2021.243389
ESCOBAR, Arturo. Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham: Duke University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smq2g
FERREIRA, Dulce Naiara Carvalho et al. A utilização da caderneta agroecológica por mulheres de comunidades rurais no projeto Pró-Semiárido, Bahia. Revista de Educação Popular, v. 21, n. 1, p. 331–345, 2022. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/reveducpop/article/view/62077
FEDERICI, Silvia. Re-enchanting the world: Feminism and the politics of the commons. Oakland: PM Press, 2019. Disponível em: https://pmpress.org/index.php?l=product_detail&p=1008
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION. The State of Food and Agriculture 2023: Women in agrifood systems. Rome: FAO, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cc7724en
HARAWAY, Donna. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q
LEACH, Melissa; SCOONES, Ian; STIRLING, Andy. Dynamic sustainabilities: Technology, environment, social justice. London: Routledge, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775069
MARTÍNEZ-ALIER, Joan. The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843765486
MECHÉ, Bénédicte. Black as drought: Decolonial ecological thought and the politics of drylands. Anthropological Research for Environmental Studies, v. 13, n. 1, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2022.130105
MOREIRA, Luiz F. et al. Agroecologia e tecnologias sociais na convivência com o semiárido: o relato de uma experiência cearense. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia, v. 42, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35977/0104-1096.cct2025.v42.27495
NIGHTINGALE, Andrea J. Power and politics in climate change adaptation efforts: struggles over authority and recognition in the context of political ecology. Geoforum, v. 64, p. 289–297, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.02.020
OLIVEIRA, Sônia Maria Alves de; SILVA, Mayra Soares. Tecnologias sociais e práticas educativas contextualizadas para a convivência com o semiárido: o lugar das mulheres. Cadernos de Gênero e Tecnologia, v. 15, n. 45, p. 48–63, 2022. Disponível em: https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/cgt/article/view/13241
OSTROM, Elinor. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
PERZ, Stephen et al. Gender and climate change adaptation in rural contexts: a systematic review. Global Environmental Change, v. 63, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102135
ROCHELEAU, Dianne; THOMAS-SLAYTER, Barbara; WANGARI, Esther. Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experiences. London: Routledge, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203355435
SHIVA, Vandana. Staying alive: Women, ecology and development. London: Zed Books, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350219786
SILIPRANDI, Emma. Mulheres e agroecologia: Transformando o campo e a cidade. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.ufrj.br/edicoes/mulheres-e-agroecologia
SOUZA, Marcela Tavares de; SILVA, Michelly Dias da; CARVALHO, Rachel. Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein, v. 8, n. 1, p. 102–106, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082010RW1134
TORRACO, Richard J. Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, v. 15, n. 4, p. 404–428, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
TORRES, Janine Beatriz et al. Projeto cisternas fertilizadas: um recorte sobre agroecologia, tecnologias sociais e gênero. Anais do CONIMAS/CONIDIS, 2019. Disponível em: https://editorarealize.com.br/artigo/visualizar/63828
UN WOMEN. Gender equality and climate change: A review of evidence. New York: UN Women, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2022/gender-equality-and-climate-change
WHITTEMORE, Robin; KNAFL, Kathleen. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, v. 52, n. 5, p. 546–553, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x