Abstract
The article explores the relationship between the level of emotional intelligence of students and their self-regulation skills. The study was conducted with the participation of 132 students, quantitative and correlation design was used. The Bar-On model was used to measure emotional intelligence, and the Self-Regulation Questionnaire technique was used to assess self-regulation.The results showed that there is a positive and statistically significant relationship between the level of emotional intelligence and self-regulation skills. A high level of emotional intelligence is characterized by more effective management of emotional abilities and assimilation of behavior patterns appropriate to the situation. The study revealed that the components of emotional intelligence, especially emotion management and stress resistance, have a closer connection with self-regulation.The results of the study indicate that the development of emotional intelligence contributes to more adaptive behavior of students both in the academic and social environment. In this regard, the development and application of psychological interventions aimed at the development of emotional intelligence are considered expedient.
References
Jabbarov, R (2021). Psychological issues of formation of socio-cultural values in students. Apuntes Universitarios,: 11(3), julio-setiembre ISSN: 2304-0335DOI:https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i3.695
Jabbarov, R., Azimzadeh, N., Namazova, G., Abbasova, N., & Guliyev, C. (2024). The impact of mental health on students’ academic performance. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 25(S1), 2517-2527.
Jabbarov, R. V. (2018). Researching of dependence between the self-realization and academic achievement of the students from different professional occupations. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valore, (2).
Skinner, B. F. (1961). Operant behavior: An experimental analysis.
Thorndike, E. L. (1931). Principles of learning. Teachers College, Columbia University.
Weibell, K. (2011). Principles of learning. Pearson.
Estes, W. K. (1967). Rewards, motivation and learning. Prentice-Hall.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedbackinterventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2002). Thought and language. MIT Press.
Brooks, J. G. (1967). The process of learning: New perspectives from research. Prentice-Hall.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Lukyanenko, I. (2007). Feedback in educational processes.
Petrushenko, I. P. (1967). Feedback in educationalprocesses.
Bessonov, K. A. (2016). Feedback in pedagogical teacher–student interaction. Juvenis Scientia, 2, 86–89. Məqaləyəbax
Solovyov, V. A. (1992). Feedback in social communication. Moscow University Press.
Aymyaqa, I. (2014). Feedback in activity-based learning: Communication and quality.
Vakil, J. R. (2021). Psychological direction of the formation of multicultural values. Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, 620-637.
Джаббаров, Р. В. О., & Ибрагимова, Х. Н. (2013). О воздействии процесса самореализации подростков на их профессиональную ориентацию. Вектор науки Тольяттинского государственного университета. Серия: Педагогика, психология, (2(13)), 97–100.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Hasanova Simara, Huseynova Fatima, Mahmudova Sabina, Islamli Raya

