MICROFOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOR BICHECTOMY EFFECT
MICROFOCUSED

Palavras-chave

Microfocused Ultrasound; Facial Slimming Bichectomy; Neocollagenesis.

Como Citar

Vieira Melo Aguiar, S. ., Regina Veronezi, L. ., Vivianne Nogueira, M. ., Rabelo Lima Barbosa, C. ., Rodrigues Ribeiro, H. ., Lemos Maia, J. ., Elayne Silva Montezuma, G. ., & Januzzi Santos, M. (2023). MICROFOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOR BICHECTOMY EFFECT. Health and Society, 3(06), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.51249/hs.v3i06.1785

Resumo

The search for aesthetic treatments is becoming increasingly common in clinics, with facial slimming being one of the most sought-after procedures. In an effort to address techniques less invasive than surgical procedures, the use of Microfocused Ultrasound (MFU) has been gaining prominence. This case report aims to evaluate the efficacy of MFU in facial slimming for a patient seeking to improve the contour of her face. Methodology: The treatment area was delimited by a line drawn from the labial commissure to the tragus, with a safety margin of 1cm on both sides. Both areas were divided into three columns (anterior, middle, and posterior) to receive the transducers. Ultrasound gel was applied to the skin before the procedure. The technology used was Reface. Initially, 4 MHz transducers with 4.5 mm depth and 0.9J power were applied to the area with 15 shots on both sides of the face, distributed as follows: six in the anterior column, six in the middle column, and three in the posterior column. Next, a 7 MHz transducer with 3.0 mm depth and 0.9J power was applied to the area with 15 shots on each side of the face, distributed similarly. The transducers were reoriented with each shot, advancing 1mm upward in both areas. These areas were chosen with the goal of slimming the middle third of the face. Results: The patient was evaluated after 60 days, and a reduction in volume on the left and right sides of the face, ranging from 1.02 to 1.79mm, was observed. The results were obtained through standardized photographs using Vectra software.

https://doi.org/10.51249/hs.v3i06.1785
MICROFOCUSED

Referências

Casabona, Gabriela; KAYE, Kai. Facial skin tightening with microfocused ultrasound and dermal fillers: considerations for patient selection and outcomes. J Drugs Dermatol, v. 18, n. 11, p. 1075-1082, 2019.

Fabi, Sabrina Guillen. Noninvasive skin tightening: focus on new ultrasound techniques. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, p. 47-52, 2015.

Gomes, Silma Silva et al. Complicações trans e pós-operatórias associadas à cirurgia de bichectomia na prática clínica. Research, Society and Development, v. 11, n. 16, p. e485111638475-e485111638475, 2022.

Hernandez, Oscar et al. Anatomical relationships of the adipose buccal fat pad associated with bichectomy complications. About a case. International Journal of Morphology, v. 39, n. 1, p. 123-133, 2021.

Meyer, Patricia Froes et al. Effect of Microfocused Ultrasound on Facial Rejuvenation: Clinical and Histological Evaluation. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, v. 9, n. 7, p. 112-125, 2021.

Shome, Debraj et al. Use of micro-focused ultrasound for skin tightening of mid and lower face. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, v. 7, n. 12, 2019.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Saskya Vieira Melo Aguiar, Lauscea Regina Veronezi, Marcia Vivianne Nogueira, Chrystianne Rabelo Lima Barbosa, Henrique Rodrigues Ribeiro, Juliana Lemos Maia, Gina Elayne Silva Montezuma, Marcelo Januzzi Santos

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...