39
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 06 - n 02 - ano 2026
HUMANİSTİC VALUE ORİENTATİONS OF STUDENT IDENTİTY AND
THE PARADOX OF SELF-ACTUALİZATİON İN HİGHER EDUCATİON
INSTİTUTİONS
Aliyev Nihad1
Ganbarova Masuma2
Zahidova Aysel3
Gurbanli Aysu4
Abstract: This article provides a comprehensive examination of the avenues for cultivating
humanistic values in higher education institutions. The primary objective of the study was to identify
the psychological characteristics and developmental patterns of the emergence of humanistic values
among Azerbaijani students. To this end, an empirical study was conducted among a total of 120
students at Azerbaijan State Pedagogical University. The obtained results show that a high level of
altruism is not always directly related to a high level of humanistic thinking. However, it is possible
to activate latent potential through the strengthening of socially accepted motivations and to utilize
it for the development of humanistic values. Based on the research ndings, regardless of students
levels of self-assessment and self-afrmation, their overall attitude toward humanistic values remains
high. The formative inuence in the development of these values is attributed to the inuential
characteristics of social values, which hold a leading position in a professional self-afrmation and
value system that reects the holistic qualities of the personality. It was also determined that there is
1 Psychology student of SABAH Groups Baku State University Baku, Azerbaijan. Orcid: https://
orcid.org/0009-0001-7114-7427
2 Psychology student of SABAH Groups Baku State University Baku, Azerbaijan. Orcid: https://
orcid.org/0009-0007-0506-4176
3 Psychology student of SABAH Groups Baku State University Baku, Azerbaijan. Orcid: https://
orcid.org/0009-0007-3554-2650
4 Psychology student of SABAH Groups Baku State University Baku, Azerbaijan. Orcid: https://
orcid.org/0009-0007-8333-0871
40
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 06 - n 02 - ano 2026
a positive correlation between humanistic qualities, personality traits, and academic achievements.
Although this correlation is weak in some cases, it is statistically signicant.
Keywords: higher education institutions, humanistic values, students, educational orientations,
perspectives
Introduction
The socio-political, socio-economic, and cultural processes occurring in the context of
modern globalization, particularly intercultural integration, have a signicant impact on young
peoples value systems, self-perception, and social relationships. As a result of this inuence, a new
value system is formed, which reects both positive and negative elements. It should be noted that
negative values can weaken humanistic approaches, inuencing not only studentsviews but also
their motivational sphere and behavioral patterns (Jabbarov et al, 2024). This, in turn, creates certain
contradictions in the national self-awareness of young people. As a country with multicultural and
tolerant traditions, Azerbaijan is in an exemplary position from a humanist perspective. However,
to preserve and develop these values, it is crucial to protect students from foreign inuences and to
strengthen humanist thinking. On the other hand, the increased focus on the spiritual and psychological
characteristics of the individual in the modern era, the changing attitude toward humanity, and the
inuence of globalization make the formation of humanist values one of the priority areas. The main
trends observed in global integration processes are also based on a humanistic approach, and this
approach is clearly manifested in the eld of education. In this regard, the formation of a personality
with humanistic values is considered one of the main goals of modern education. Changes in the
world, especially the increase in the ow of information, can make it difcult for young people to
correctly analyze this data and assimilate it within the national context (Jabbarov, 2021; Jabbarov,
2018).
41
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 06 - n 02 - ano 2026
For this reason, it is necessary to expand educational activities, conduct psychological
research, and strengthen family-school cooperation. The formation of humanistic behavior in young
people should begin at an early age and be continued systematically. Humanist values are generally
closely linked to the problems that arise in the process of human development and require the formation
of a behavioral culture in accordance with the socio-economic and cultural characteristics of each era.
In this context, one of the main tasks facing higher education institutions is to cultivate young people
who can think independently, possess a high level of cultural awareness, and have a sense of social
responsibility. Young people with such qualities are shaped into useful, morally rich, and mature
individuals for society. The main purpose of this article is precisely to examine the characteristics of
the formation of humanistic values in this regard.
Methodology
In this study, the methods of observation, interview, questionnaire, and psychological testing
were used. The research applied M. Rokichs “Value Orientation” questionnaire, S. Schwartzs value
system methodology, as well as the “Self-Assessment” and E. Shostroms SAT methodologies. In
addition, supplementary survey questions were used to determine the inuence of mass media and
the self-awareness process on the formation of humanistic values. The research was conducted among
students at Odlar Yurdu University and the Azerbaijan State Pedagogical University. Participants
were selected from both higher education institutions, with a total of participants. The obtained
results were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively.edilmişdir.
Literature review
The formation of studentshumanistic values in higher education institutions is considered
one of the most fundamental issues in modern pedagogy and psychology. The theoretical foundations
42
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 06 - n 02 - ano 2026
of this process stem directly from humanistic psychology and its proposed methodological concepts.
Humanistic values serve as both an indicator of personal development and a common moral heritage
of humanity. In this context, Maslow (2018) expresses the concept of values with a very interesting
analogy, likening them to “a great chest in which are stored various, often not fully claried, meanings.
Although the multifaceted research conducted to date retains certain controversial points regarding
the nature of values and their relationship with society, it is undeniable that the content of each value,
in addition to individual characteristics, is also shaped by the perspective of the ethnicity and culture
to which it belongs.
In modern times, the application of constructivist, cognitive, and gestalt approaches is
particularly recommended for the systematic formation of these values in higher education institutions.
As researchers note (Chen & Carsten, 2017), creating cognitive dissonance, using contextual teaching
methods, and original assessment systems are the main driving forces for integrating humanistic
elements into education. These approaches aim not only to transmit knowledge but also to instill
values such as dignity, autonomy, freedom, integrity, and well-being within the learners’ inner world.
The ultimate goal of education, as emphasized by Nemiroff (1992), is to cultivate “self-actualized”
individuals in the truest sense of the term. Scholars such as Aloni (2011) and Veugelers (2011) believe
that students should enjoy making decisions about their own lives, and teachers should deeply believe
in students’ freedom of choice.
Creating a humane educational environment also directly impacts students academic
achievement and their motivation to learn. Scott (1980) proves that in such an environment, students
have a more positive attitude toward classes, spend more time on assignments, and, most importantly,
genuinely enjoy the learning process. However, research by PariNaz, PourAli, et al. (2017) shows that
in practice, the four main components of education—the environment, the teachers role, the student’s
role, and assessment methodsare still not at the desired level, indicating that the humanistic approach
is not being used to its full potential. To ll this gap, it is necessary to use methods for activating
emotions in education. The identication of values, especially humanistic ones, allows us to unlock
43
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 06 - n 02 - ano 2026
the psychological mechanism of assessment and understand the nature of the socio-psychological
environment. Jabbarov (2018) rightly emphasizes that values are fundamental concepts that guide a
persons life path and strategy. They determine priorities in the perception of reality and inuence the
general way of life of society ( Jabbarov, 2018; Jabbarov and Ibragimova, 2013). In higher education,
the formation of these values entails the development of qualities such as goodness, compassion,
justice, tolerance, and multiculturalism.
All the worlds thinkers have always called on young people to strive for truth and justice,
reminding them of the principle, as stated in Azerbaijani folklore (2005), “you reap what you sow.
In proposed models for the development of humanistic values in education (William, 2015),
the unity of methods such as critical thinking, practical skills, and support groups optimizes the
formation of professional identity. Although technological progress and industrialization sometimes
overshadow humanist traditions, modern student-centerededucational approaches create conditions
for the revival of these values (Vakil, 2021). The humanization of the system also requires a combination
of ethical leadership and responsibility, which ensures harmony in both professional and personal
life (Baumeister, 1991). In conclusion, schools and universities should not aim for academic success
alone, but must create an environment where transparency, truth, and humane communication prevail
(Effendi et al., 2020). Only then can the humanization of education bear its true fruit.
Results
In the rst phase of the research conducted to examine the psychological characteristics
of the formation of humanist values among young people in Azerbaijan, an assessment of the
value domain was carried out. The primary objective of this phase was to identify the dominant
humanist tendencies in the students’ personalities and to determine their place within their individual
psychological structure.
44
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 06 - n 02 - ano 2026
Table.1. Indicators of terminal and instrumental values (expressed as a percentage, n=120 before and
after the experiment)
Terminal values Before (%) After (%) Rank Dynamics İnstrumental values Before (%) After (%) Rank dynamics
Active life 35 52 +8 ↑ Orderliness 60 40 -5
Wisdom 38 24 +1 Politeness 65 80 -1
Health 70 85 -1 High demands 52 18 +1
İnteresting work 45 27 -2 Cheerfulness 54 62 +8 ↑
Beauty of nature
and art
68 12 -14 ↓ Efciency 50 5-3
Love 53 42 -3 İndependence 56 11 -9 ↓
Financial security 51 57 +2 İntolerance of
shortcomings
59 37 +9 ↑
Reliable friends 55 75 +2 Education 63 86 +1 ↑
Social
recognition
44 81 +8 ↑ Responsibility 61 70 0
İnner harmony 48 31 -2 Rationalism 55 34 +2
Productive life 33 48 +8 ↑ Self-control 62 78 +2 ↑
Development 57 92 +4 ↑ Courage 57 47 +4
Entertainment 41 9-4 ↓ Strong will 58 7-9
Freedom 30 6-1 Tole r a nce 56 14 -9
Happy family life 69 37 -7 Broad- mindedness 58 30 -2
Happiness of
others
28 14 +3 Honesty 57 26 -2
Creativity 42 22 -2 Effectiveness 49 53 +10 ↑
Self-condence 58 63 -1 Sensitivity 47 16 +3
As can be seen from Table 1, the highest increase in the terminal values group was in
Development’ (from 57% to 92%, +4 ranks), Social recognition(from 44% to 81%, +8 ranks) and
Active life (from 35% to 52%, +8 ranks). This result indicates that, following the experimental
intervention, students desire for social recognition and self-development has signicantly
strengthened. At the same time, the sharp decline in the ‘Beauty of nature and artvalue (from 68%
to 12%, -14 ranks) is noteworthy; this suggests that students are shifting from an aesthetic-emotional
orientation towards practical-social values. The decline in the values of ‘Freedom’ (from 30% to 6%)
and ‘Entertainment’ (from 41% to 9%, -4 ranks) also aligns with this trend.
45
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 06 - n 02 - ano 2026
Within the instrumental values group, Effectiveness(from 49% to 53%, +10 ranks) and
Cheerfulness (from 54% to 62%, +8 ranks) showed the most signicant positive dynamics. The
Educationvalue, meanwhile, remained high, rising from 63% to 86% (+1 rank), which indicates
a strengthening of academic motivation. Conversely, a sharp decrease is notable in the values of
Independence’ (from 56% to 11%, a drop of 9 ranks), ‘Strong will(from 58% to 7%), and Tolerance
(from 56% to 14%). Taken together, these results indicate that the experimental intervention
strengthened students socially-oriented, collectivist values, while instrumental values related to
individual will and independent behaviour were relegated to the background. The overall picture from
Table 1 conrms that the students’ value system took on a more humanist-social orientation after the
experimental process.
Table.2. Indicators of the correlative relationship between humanistic values and personality traits in
students
Humanistic values
Self- awareness Cognitive needs Self-esteem Self- afrmation Academic achievements
Friendship 0,32** 0,35 ** 0,20* 0,32** 0,22*
Love 0.89** -0,37** -0.76** -0.26** 0,66**
Empathy 0,38** -0.23* 0,98** -0,43** 0,54**
Altruism 0, 58** 0,21* 0,42** 0.56** 0,27**
Moral values 0,44** 0,46** 0.78** 0.69** 0.19*
Social ideals 0.186* 0.232* 0.49** 0, 96** 0.72**
Note:** signicant at the 0.01 level, * signicant at the 0.05 level
The correlation analysis conducted (see Table 2) reveals the existence of complex relationships
among studentshumanistic value system, personality qualities, and academic achievements. The
statistical prole of the study indicates that positive correlations predominantly prevail between
humanistic qualities and personality traits. In particular, the value of social ideals with self-assertion
46
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 06 - n 02 - ano 2026
($r=0.96, p<0.01) and self-esteem ($r=0.49, p<0.01) demonstrate that the extent to which an individual
internalises social ideals directly inuences their sense of self-condence.
Based on the results of the research, the process of forming humanistic thinking and values
in young people can be divided into three fundamental stages:
Stage I (Cognitive assimilation): The young peoples understanding and perception of
humanist qualities, and the elimination of psychological factors that hinder this process.
In this stage, it is important to reinforce correct perceptions of humanist values to prevent
potential distortions during the assimilation process.
Stage II (Experiential Application): The application of the consolidated concepts in
various situations. Here, students attitudes towards the values are assessed through
experimental and reective tasks.
Stage III (Self-actualisation): An investigation into the degree to which assimilated values
are integrated into the personalitys moral development and self-education.
One of the study’s notable ndings is that not every individual who exhibits highly altruistic
behaviour necessarily possesses a strong humanist thought system. This indicates that humanism
is an internal disposition and that its development requires the activation of socially valued motives
and inherent potential. At the same time, the correlation matrix conrms that the development of
humanist values is intertwined with cognitive demands, opportunities for self-afrmation, and
academic achievements.
The creation of a moral ideal is of particular importance for the formation of these values
within the Azerbaijani ethno-cultural environment. The life paths of national heroes and the activities
of state gures, based on our ethnopsychological heritage, serve as a model of humane behaviour for
students.
Consequently, the application of humanist principles alongside pragmatic objectives is
essential in the modern education system (Waddock, 2016; Melé, 2016). It is not effective to limit
47
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 06 - n 02 - ano 2026
the humanist approach to only certain areas of the educational process; Conversely, it is possible to
strengthen pupils self-condence and healthy social relationships through teamwork and project-
based learning methods. The synthesis of humanist and pragmatic approaches by teachers serves both
to organise an effective teaching process and to create a morally sound social environment.
Discussion and Conclusion
Based on the data obtained through our research, the development of a certain humanistic
mindset in students is directly proportional to the development of humanistic values. Thus, to develop
humanistic values in a student, it is necessary to foster empathy and compassion toward others. One
interesting aspect is that not all individuals with high altruistic behavior possess a strong humanistic
mindset. It is possible to strengthen social motivations for the development of humanistic thinking,
activate the hidden internal potential in a person, and direct it toward the development of this way
of thinking. Our research showed that students positive attitude toward humanistic values does
not depend on how they evaluate themselves or the extent of their self-afrmation. We conclude
that humanism exists in students as an internal inclination. When we look at what inuences the
development of humanistic values, the basis is the individuals general character traits, self-awareness,
and the importance they place on social values. It should also be added that there is a positive correlation
between personal characteristics, moral qualities, and academic achievement.
Although this connection may not always be clearly visible, it is statistically signicant. In
addition, a correlation has been observed between the student’s process of self-awareness, self-esteem,
and self-afrmation, and the humanist social ideas they adopt. Similar, but weaker, relationships
are observed for other personal qualities. All of this indicates that the role of theoretical knowledge
alone is insufcient for the development of humanist values. During the process, cognitive needs,
self-afrmation, and academic achievements should also be taken into account. Although our
ndings are similar to those of other studies, they also differ in certain respects. One of the main
48
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 06 - n 02 - ano 2026
distinctions of our article is that it demonstrates how humanist principles can be more effectively
applied in a collaborative, project-based, and more agile learning environment. However, looking at
the reality of today, the humanistic approach is rarely used in educational institutions, and education
is more pragmatic in style. (Waddock, 2016; Dierksmeier, 2016; Me, 2016). Some studies separate
humanitarian and technical education, stating how humanist principles should be applied in technical
education (Miller & Gregson, 1999). Nevertheless, during the course of instruction, the teacher uses
humanistic methods without realizing it. This also shows that humanistic approaches and pragmatic
goals can be applied together. The main reason for the limitations of humanist principles in education
to certain areas is the specic perspectives involved. However, it should be noted that these principles
are not contrary to the course of practical activity and can be effectively used by teachers in all
areas of education. (Miller & Gregson, 1999). Many studies have shown that the humanistic approach
increases studentsmotivation and orientation toward the lesson. It has even been shown that a great
deal of time and resources can be saved. Finally, to properly develop humanistic values in students,
teachers must apply diverse and contemporary approaches during lessons. The core of the process is
to strengthen students’ self-condence, help them build healthy social relationships, and demonstrate
the importance of moral values. The teacher must apply a combination of a pragmatic and a humanistic
approach to ensure an effective lesson and create a healthy social environment.
References
Aloni, N. (2011). Humanistic education: From theory to practice. In W. Veugelers (Ed.), Education
and humanism: Linking autonomy and humanity Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Brockett, R.G. (1998).Humanism as an instructional paradigm. Retrieved fromhttp://roghie mstr
a.com/romira1.html
Dierksmeier, C. (2016). What is HumanisticAbout Humanistic Management?. Humanist Management
Journal, 1, 932 2016; URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41463-016-0002-6
49
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 06 - n 02 - ano 2026
De Groot, I. (2011). Why we are not democratic yet: The complexity of developing a democratic
attitude. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Effendi, R, Bafadal, I, Nyoman D, Arin I. ( 2020). The Construction Model of Inculcating Principal
Humanistic Values in Forming a Characteristic School Environment. Preprints Posted: 2, 19, 21-43.
URL: doi: 10.20944/preprints202011.0068.v1).
Maslow, A. (2018). Motivation and personality.Moskva, Peter.
Jabbarov, R (2021). Psychological issues of formation of socio-cultural values in students. Apuntes
Universitarios,: 11(3), julio-setiembre ISSN: 2304-0335 DOI:https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v11i-3.695
Jabbarov, R., Azimzadeh, N., Namazova, G., Abbasova, N., & Guliyev, C. (2024). The impact of mental
health on students’ academic performance. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 25(S1),
2517-2527.
Jabbarov, R. V. (2018). Researching of dependence between the self-realization and academic
achievement of the students from different professional occupations. Dilemas Contemporáneos:
Educación, Política y Valore, (2).
Me, D. (2016). Understanding Humanistic Management. Humanistic Management Journal, 1(1),
33-55. URL: DOI: 10.1007/s41463-016-0011-5
Miller, M.D., & Gregson, J.A. (1999). A philosophic view for seeing the past of vocationaleducation
and envisioning the future of workforce education: Ann Arbor, MI: Prakken.
Nemiroff, G.H. (1992). Reconstructing education: Toward a pedagogy of critical humanism.New
York, NY: Bergin & Garvey.
Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values: a theory of organization and change. Jossey-Bass,
San Francisco, California, USA.
Vakil, J. R. (2021). Psychological direction of the formation of multicultural values. Revista on line de
Política e Gestão Educacional, 620-637.
50
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 06 - n 02 - ano 2026
Джаббаров, Р. В. О., & Ибрагимова, Х. Н. (2013). О воздействии процесса самореализации
подростков на их профессиональную ориентацию. Вектор науки Тольяттинского
государственного университета. Серия: Педагогика, психология, (2(13)), 97–100.