
55
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 05 - n 04 - ano 2025
The demand for better communication, on the other hand, points out that, even with occasional
experiences of active listening, users still perceive failures in feedback, clarity of information and
continuity of care. Neves (2021) points out that communication between health professionals and users
remains one of the main obstacles in Primary Care, affecting the bond and adherence to treatment.
The absence of educational activities as a highlight in the interviewees’ statements reinforces this
diagnosis: according to Fernandes et al. (2019), despite being provided for in the FHS guidelines,
health education actions are often secondary or executed in a disjointed way, which compromises
their emancipatory power.
Finally, the data analyzed allow us to visualize a scenario in which the performance of the
FHS team is recognized, but still limited by operational and relational barriers. The predominance
of “regular” evaluation among users is related, according to Silva et al. (2015), to the fragmentation
of institutional communication, the insufciency of continuous welcoming practices and the fragility
of the territorial bond. These limitations, although they do not constitute a negative perception of
the service, indicate the urgency of strengthening local planning, with a focus on qualied listening,
effective territorial presence and the restructuring of internal care ows.
Active listening, although present in some situations, still lacks systematization that
guarantees its effectiveness as a central practice in welcoming and humanizing care. According to
Garcia et al. (2020), listening is not just listening, but requires specic communication skills, empathy,
and interpretation of the reality experienced by the user from the professional. When this listening
occurs in a fragmented or unqualied way, there is a loss of bond and a reduction in adherence to
care. In addition, as Neves (2021) points out, the absence of organizational communication strategies
impairs the understanding of internal ows and compromises the user’s journey through the services,
generating confusion, insecurity, and discontinuity in care.
The users’ perception of the team’s level of knowledge in relation to the territory reafrms
the importance of territorialization as a structuring axis of the Family Health Strategy. However, as
demonstrated by Azeredo et al. (2007), the mere presence of the team in a given geographical area